Legal Opinion

People v. Valenzuela

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 2010No. C061539PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BUTZ, J.

In a bifurcated proceeding, the trial court determined that defendant Angel Felix Valenzuela was previously convicted of a “serious” felony within the meaning of the three strikes law and thus the prior conviction qualified as a “strike.” Defendant contends that decision is not supported by sufficient evidence. We agree.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

The underlying facts are not disputed. An amended complaint was filed on August 18, 2008, charging defendant with second degree burglary in violation of Penal Code section 4591 (count one) and grand theft in violation of section…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  2. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. BarraganCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. CardenasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. In re RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. People v. OlloCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
  4. People v. Fife CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API