Legal Opinion
In re Richardson
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 13, 2011No. C062684PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*652Opinion
NICHOLSON, Acting P. J.
Petitioner Jimmy Richardson seeks relief in habeas corpus from his prior strike conviction on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. He also asks us to recall the remittitur issued on the underlying appeal on the basis of judicial error. We deny the petition. Many of his claims were addressed earlier on appeal and are not cognizable on a petition for habeas corpus. Those claims that remain fail to show ineffective assistance of counsel or a valid basis for recalling the remittitur.
FACTS
After a jury convicted petitioner in 2004 of assaulting his wife with…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- People v. OehmigenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. SampleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- People v. Harris, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. Fleming, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- People v. OehmigenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.