Legal Opinion

People v. Rodriguez

California Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1998No. S055670PublishedCited by 117 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

In this case we consider how People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 [53 Cal.Rptr.2d 789, 917 P.2d 628], should apply to that narrow class of defendants whose sentencing courts erroneously believed, and indicated on the record, that they lacked discretion to strike prior felony conviction allegations under the “Three Strikes” law (Pen. Code, §§ 667, subds. (b)-(i), 1170.12) 1 and whose appeals are not yet final. We recently observed that such cases must be remanded to give sentencing courts an opportunity to exercise their discretion. (People v. Fuhrman…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. GuerreroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by117 opinions

  1. People v. RundleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. People v. GutierrezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. LawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. McCulloughCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. BuckhalterCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001

112 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API