Legal Opinion

Ramey v. Ramey

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 25, 1979No. 21059PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

Respondent, Ruby Ramey, challenges the constitutionality of the South Carolina Guest Statute, § 15-1-290, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976). We conclude the statute violates the equal protection guarantees of the South Carolina and United States Constitutions.

Respondent sued her husband, Williard, for personal injuries sustained by her while a non-paying guest passenger in his motor vehicle. In his answer the appellant, Williard Ramey, alleged that the accident was not intentional on his part and denied that he was guilty of any reckless, wilful, or wanton misconduct in the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Brown v. MerloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Manistee Bank & Trust Co. v. McGowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Henry Ex Rel. Henry v. BauderSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Malan v. LewisUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Bierkamp v. RogersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
  3. Elam v. ElamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  4. Whitworth v. BynumTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Paul v. National LifeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API