State v. Burno
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClaeksoN, J.
Officer B. L. Finch, a witness for the State, had testi- ■ fied previously. The State had rested, then the defendant, Simon Portee, testified in his own behalf and, among other witnesses testifying for him, was his wife, Victoria Portee. Thereupon, Finch was recalled. He proceeded to testify as to a conversation he had with Simon as to when he had gone home the night of the assault. That evidence was as follows: “Simon said he got in about 11 o’clock and his wife came out to the car where Chief Miller and myself was and I asked her — he was present, standing there — and she said, ‘It was late…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. . BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- Churchill v. HoltMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- State v. . RecordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- State v. . RandallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. ErwinUtah Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. . HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- State v. HawkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Griffith v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933