People v. Oscar
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Ionia. (Davis, J.) Respondent was convicted of obtaining money by means of false pretenses. The facts are stated in tbe opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
Respondent was convicted of obtaining money upon false pretenses. The complaint set forth that respondent, with intent to cheat and defraud one Seig, and fraudulently obtain from him $350, applied to Seig for a loan of said amount, and did represent that he was the owner óf a one-half interest in two lots of land, and to induce Seig to loan him the said $350, and to take a mortgage as security on said lots, and with intent to cheat and defraud said Seig, he represented that “the said lots were of the value of $1,200, and that there was then and there and at that time a house of the value of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
- Cox v. CrippenMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. CroninSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. DetloffSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Commonwealth v. GrifeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- People v. StockwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Baskerville v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.