Legal Opinion

Baskerville v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 19, 1974No. 102, September Term, 1974PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

As in a “shell game” at a country carnival, a “check kiting” scheme has the elements of the crime of false pretenses moving back and forth from one transaction to the next so rapidly under the hands of a skilled manipulator that the ultimate resting place of a particular element is exceedingly difficult to locate.

Webster’s Third New International Dictionary (Unabridged) gives the following definition of the verb “kite”:

“To get money or credit by a kite: specif: to create a false bank balance by manipulating deposited accounts.”

51 Corpus Juris Secundum, at 532, defines “kiting” as:

“Originally…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Metz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Polisher v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  5. State v. MillsArizona Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Andresen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Denby v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. GrifeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Lane v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Riggs v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API