Legal Opinion

Cox v. Crippen

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1865PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Case made after judgment from Kalamazoo Circuit. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Cooley J.-.

A judgment having been recovered against one Richardson, before a Justice of the Peace, in a suit commenced May 13, 1858, Crippen, the defendant in this *506suit, appears by the docket of the Justice, to have signed the following entry therein, immediately under the entry of the judgment:

“I acknowledge myself surety for the payment to the plaintiff, by the defendant, to pay the above judgment, with interest and cost thereon, on. or before the expiration of ten months from the 31st day of May, A. D. 1858, agreeably to law.
“Warren S. Crippen.”

Below this was the following subscription: “I…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. McAllisterIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Hougland v. State ex rel. McCoolIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. People v. OscarMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Vincennes National Bank v. CockrumIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Hollister v. GiddingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1872

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API