Legal Opinion

Isnard v. Edgar Zinc Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 12, 1910No. 16,335PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

The appellant was engaged in 1902, at Cherryvale, Kan., in the smelting of zinc from ores, and employed in and about the business natural gas, owned and operated its own gas plant, and had a number of accessory enterprises and a number of buildings for different parts of its work. It appears from the evidence that part of this business was manufacturing condensers and tile, and that it had a building for that special purpose. The building was one story high above the basement, which was five and one-half or six feet deep, and the building was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Coughtry v. . Globe Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. Johnson v. SpearMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Nyback v. Champagne Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1901
  4. Bard v. ElstonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  5. Barclay v. Puget Sound Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Laffery v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  2. Eisminger v. BemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Provident Loan Trust Co. v. WolcottCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1896
  4. Blake v. BremyerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Moore v. OwensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API