Legal Opinion

Bard v. Elston

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1884PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error from Johnson District Court. Forcible detainer, brought by Bard against Elston. Trial at the November Term, 1882, and judgment for defendant for costs. Bard brings the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action of forcible detainer, commenced in a justice’s court, and appealed to the district court, where the judgment now complained of was rendered. The plaintiff in error was plaintiff below, and the defendant in error was defendant below. The case was tried by the court and a jury, and a verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff for costs.

The plaintiff now insists that the court below committed error in giving instructions to the jury, and in refusing instructions. The court on its…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reeder v. . SayreNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Insurance Co. v. SeaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. Eggleston v. WagnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Ferguson v. GravesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. Jones v. . OsgoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1852

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Snyder v. StriblingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1907
  2. Watkins v. BalchWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Rhea v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
  4. Tyler Commercial College v. StapletonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  5. Deisher v. SteinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API