Legal Opinion
Alliedsignal, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. City of Phoenix
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 28, 1999No. 98-15901PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
I. OVERVIEW
KING, District Judge:
AlliedSignal, Inc. (“AlliedSignal”) appeals from the district court’s dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) of its action seeking money damages and equitable relief against the City of Phoenix (“City”) for damage to Allied-Signal’s water sprinkler systems (“systems”). AlliedSignal contends that the district court erred by (1) concluding that the City was entitled to absolute immunity against its claims for money damages, and (2) concluding that mandamus relief was unavailable in light of the City’s discretion in implementing its water…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Steckman v. Hart Brewing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Richard L. Barron Linda M. Barron v. Robert Reich Department of Labor Robert KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Stone v. Arizona Highway CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Greg Landers v. Quality Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- In Re Graphics Processing Units Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Larry Flynt v. Stephanie K. ShimazuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Arpin v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cox Communications PCS, L.P. v. City of San MarcosDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2002
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.