Legal Opinion
Yes on Prop 200 v. Napolitano
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided June 28, 2007No. 1 CA-CV 05-235PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SNOW, Judge.
¶ 1 Plaintiffs appeal the dismissal of their First Amended Verified Special Action Complaint and the denial of their Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Verified Special Action Complaint. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court’s dismissal of the statutory special action mandamus claims in the First Amended Complaint. We also affirm its determination that, to the extent the Second Amended Complaint seeks additional mandamus relief against the Governor, the Attorney General or the Secretary of State, it would be futile to allow such amendments. We reverse,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Fidelity Security Life Insurance v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Sears v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Chavez v. BrewerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Office of the Auditor of Accounts v. Office of the Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
- Sensing v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Reeves v. BarlowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.