Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Rys. Co.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
WILKERSON, District Judge.
The questions raised by the various motions which were set for hearing and disposition on June 25th are so interrelated, and the arguments upon said several motions covered so wide a field (comprehending steps taken and orders entered from the very inception of the receivership proceedings), that it seems desirable to file this memorandum stating the conclusions of the court and the reasons therefor.
The motions argued on June 25th and June 26th were as follows:(1) Motion made by the city of Chicago on December 20, 1928, to strike from the files a petition of Orville…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. California Coöperative CanneriesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Horn v. Pere Marquette R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1907
- Adler v. SeamanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Kansas City, W. & N. W. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1892
- City & County of Denver v. StengerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bourne v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Worcester v. Chicago Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- Tilney v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Rys. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1936
- Johnson v. McBrianCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932