Legal Opinion

Tilney v. City of Chicago

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 16, 1943No. 8013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LINDLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs seek to reverse a judgment dismissing their suit. They are nonresidents of the state of Illinois and sue as members of a class, that is, patrons of the passenger transportation system of the city of Chicago, praying that the city and its executive officers account for and pay into the court for distribution to plaintiffs and others similarly situated the “traction fund” created by and emanating from the provisions of the municipal ordinances of 1907; that the city be enjoined from diverting the fund, and that the court, after ascertaining its true amount,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Carson Pirie Scott & Co. v. ParrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. The People v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Styles v. F. R. Long Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
  4. Chicago Railways Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Chicago Rys. Co. v. Illinois Commerce CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sachs v. Ohio Nat. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1945
  2. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1962
  3. Schwartz v. BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1949
  4. Klefstad v. American Cent. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API