Legal Opinion

Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Chicago Rys. Co.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided November 21, 1936No. Nos. 6839, 9915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKERSON, District Judge.

Decrees of foreclosure and sale were entered in the above causes on May 11, 1931.

The decrees provided that those desiring to bid for the property should file with the special master á statement as to whether or not the bid was on behalf of a corporation organized with the intention that it should acquire the property pursuant to a plan of reorganization, and that, if the property was to be so acquired, a copy of the plan should b.e filed with the special master.

The decrees further provided that the special master should report to the court the bids received at the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. BoydSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Kansas City Terminal Railway Co. v. Central Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. The People v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Temmer v. Denver Tramway Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
  5. Babcock v. Chicago Railways Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. (HC) Shrader v. GarlandDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. In re Chicago Rys. Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API