Legal Opinion

Smith v. Dunlop Tire Corp.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 19, 1995No. 1931702PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a retaliatory discharge case. The issues presented are (1) whether the trial court committed reversible error by striking the plaintiff's affidavits in opposition to the defendant's motion for summary judgment; and (2) whether the trial court committed reversible error by granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment. We affirm the summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Dunlop Tire Corporation.

The plaintiff, Michael D. Smith, was injured in an on-the-job accident while employed as a mold servicer at a tire manufacturing plant operated by Dunlop in Huntsville,…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bussey v. John Deere Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Anderson v. Standard Register Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Twilley v. Daubert Coated Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Culbreth v. Woodham Plumbing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Continental Eagle Corp. v. MokrzyckiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dunlop Tire Corp. v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Rothenberger v. Cast Products, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1997
  3. Carter v. AFG INDUSTRIES INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
  4. Gordon v. J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  5. Hale v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API