Legal Opinion
Tarzia v. Koopman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 26, 1960PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of the negligent operation of a motor vehicle by the defendant. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant has appealed, claiming that the court erred in certain rulings on evidence; in finding that the defendant was negligent; and in failing to find that the plaintiff was chargeable with contributory negligence. The defendant also claims that the damages awarded were excessive.
The finding, which is not subject to material correction, discloses the following…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Goodman v. Norwalk Jewish Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Stults v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Davis v. P. Gambardella & Son Cheese CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Pillou v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Gorman v. American Sumatra Tobacco CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Perley v. Glastonbury Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Gervais v. FoehrenbachSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Kronish v. ProvasoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- Kekac v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962
- DePalma v. CappellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.