Legal Opinion

Kekac v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 16, 1962PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of the defendant’s negligence. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff, and she has appealed, claiming that the damages of $1650 were inadequate.

In December, 1951, the plaintiff, while awaiting the arrival of a train in the defendant’s railroad station in Bridgeport, was injured as the result of a fall caused by a loose floor board. She sustained a mild concussion of the brain and bruises to her body and her right arm. Her neck was also injured, and she wore a traction collar for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stults v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. Squires v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
  3. Sadonis v. GovanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  4. Tarzia v. KoopmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Manning v. MichaelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Jerz v. HumphreySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  3. Campbell v. GouldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API