Legal Opinion
Coghlan v. Alpers
California Supreme Court
Decided October 16, 1903No. S.F. No. 3383PublishedCited by 6 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an appeal by two of the eontestees from a judgment of the superior court in a consolidated proceeding to contest the election of certain persons declared elected supervisors of the city and county of San Francisco, at the election held in said city and county on the fifth day of November, 1901.
The charter of San Francisco provides that the board of supervisors of said city and county shall consist of eighteen members. The canvassing board, held after the election of 1901, duly declared that eighteen persons who were candidates at said election were elected as such supervisors.…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Willburn v. WixsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- City of Los Angeles v. City of Huntington ParkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Duley v. PeacockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Shinn v. HeusnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Bright v. FernHawaii Supreme Court · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.