Bright v. Fern
Hawaii Supreme Court
ELECTION CONTEST.
1Dissent
DISSENTING OPINION OF
DE, BOLT, J.
I am unable to concur in the opinion of the majority that “the withdrawal of two of the (31) petitioners requires the dismissal of the petition.”
As I view this matter the filing of the petition by “any thirty duly qualified voters of any election district” is essential, only, to give the court jurisdiction — power to proceed in the *328hearing of the contest — and that it does not lie in the power of any one of the thirty petitioners to onst- the court of the jurisdiction thus acquired, by his withdrawal. If the opinion of the majority is sound, then, also, by the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cole's ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Sweeny v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Coghlan v. AlpersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903