Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bright v. Fern

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1910Published

ELECTION CONTEST.

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION OF

DE, BOLT, J.

I am unable to concur in the opinion of the majority that “the withdrawal of two of the (31) petitioners requires the dismissal of the petition.”

As I view this matter the filing of the petition by “any thirty duly qualified voters of any election district” is essential, only, to give the court jurisdiction — power to proceed in the *328hearing of the contest — and that it does not lie in the power of any one of the thirty petitioners to onst- the court of the jurisdiction thus acquired, by his withdrawal. If the opinion of the majority is sound, then, also, by the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cole's ElectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  2. Sweeny v. AdamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Coghlan v. AlpersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API