Legal Opinion
Duley v. Peacock
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 8, 1911No. Civ. No. 859PublishedCited by 4 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The contestant and contestee were rival candidates for the office of supervisor for the fourth supervisor district of Del Norte county at the general election held on November 8, 1910.
The official canvass of the ballots cast in the several precincts of said supervisor district disclosed the election of the contestee to said office, and his election thereto was thereupon officially declared by the board of supervisors of said county, sitting as a board of canvassers.
On December 17, 1910, the contestant filed his complaint, contesting the election of the contestee.
At the same election one…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Darcy v. Mayor of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Coghlan v. AlpersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Campbell v. FreeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
3Cited by4 opinions
- McArthur v. John McArthur Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Cooper v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Untitled California Attorney General Opinion, California Attorney General Reports2020