Legal Opinion

Sullivan v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 27, 1922No. Nos. 22,937, 22,938PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.

Two actions tried together. Respondents are husband and wife. Mrs. Sullivan brings her action to recover for personal injuries; the husband for expenses and loss of services. Separate verdicts were returned in favor of appellant. A new trial was ordered in both cases, on account of errors of law occurring at the trial. Defendant appeals.

The street car on which Mrs. Sullivan was a passenger at the time of the alleged accident and injury was coming north on Nicollet avenue in the city of Minneapolis. The car was crowded and there was no place for her to sit down. She remained standing in the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Nelson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  2. Fairchild v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Braley v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  4. Demueles v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  5. Hartikka v. D. G. Cutler Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mingo v. ExtrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API