Legal Opinion
National Labor Relations Board v. Swift & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided April 11, 1942No. 8966PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HICKS, Circuit Judge.
No jurisdictional issue is here involved.
The Board found that respondents had committed unfair labor practices within the meaning of Section 8(1) (2) and (5) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, 29 U.S.C. § 151 et seq., 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq. Upon an examination of the record we conclude that the findings are supported by substantial evidence. National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584, 61 S.Ct. 358, 85 L.Ed. 368. In view of our limited power of review [see N. L. R. (B) v. Milan Shirt Mfg. Co., 6 Cir., 125 F.2d 376, decided Feb. 4,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- National Licorice Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sands Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- National Labor Relations Board v. P. Lorillard Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gluek Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- National Labor Relations Board v. U. S. Sonics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. Federal Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
- Trailmobile Co. v. WhirlsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.