Legal Opinion
United States v. Wiley
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 10, 1996No. Crim. File No. 3-93-67. Civ. File No. 3-95-1177PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAGNUSON, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon Newman Lee Whey’s Petition for Habeas Corpus Relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Wiley argues that the Supreme Court’s recent decision, Bailey v. United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 501, 138 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995), requires the Court to vacate his conviction of violating 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1). After considering the arguments of the parties and the full record, the Court denies Whey’s Petition for the'following reasons.
BACKGROUND
In March 1993 Minneapolis police officers witnessed a driver fail to stop his vehicle at a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Reed v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ben Gary Triestman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Guzman-Rivera v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1996
- United States v. CameronDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Arnold F. Hohn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- Arnold F. Hohn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.