Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arnold F. Hohn v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 10, 1997No. 96-3118Published

1DissentMcMILLIAN, Circuit Judge

Arnold F. Hohn appeals from the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion claiming the benefit of Bailey v. United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). Section 102 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, amended 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) to require a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right” before a certificate of appealability may issue. The court denies Hohn a certificate. I must respectfully dissent.

Background

After a confidential informer told police Hohn was a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API