Arnold F. Hohn v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentMcMILLIAN, Circuit Judge
Arnold F. Hohn appeals from the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion claiming the benefit of Bailey v. United States, — U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 501, 133 L.Ed.2d 472 (1995). Section 102 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214, amended 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) to require a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right” before a certificate of appealability may issue. The court denies Hohn a certificate. I must respectfully dissent.
Background
After a confidential informer told police Hohn was a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- The United States v. Hudson and GoodwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.