Legal Opinion

Potts v. Howser

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 16, 1966No. 445PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, C.J.

The original defendant Howser has four assignments of error. He does not assign as error Judge McLaughlin’s ruling that the clerk’s order dated 26 September 1963 denying his motion for an extension of time to file answer or other responsive pleading to the complaint is adjudged correct, and is affirmed. In defendant Howser’s brief it is stated: “The defendant does not question the right of the Clerk of the Superior Court of Alexander County to sign the order (R. p. 16) denying the motion of the defendant for an extension of time to plead which is the subject of paragraph #1 of Judge…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Perry v. BassengerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. Perry v. . BassengerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Russ v. WoodardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. King v. . RuddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. Potts v. HowserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  3. REDEVELOPMENT COM'N OF CITY OF WASHINGTON v. GrimesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Robert Yale, Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of Joseph Dudley Schofield, Deceased v. National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  5. Lewis v. HopeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API