Legal Opinion

REDEVELOPMENT COM'N OF CITY OF WASHINGTON v. Grimes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1971No. 48PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Justice.

The power of eminent domain is exercised by a redevelopment commission pursuant to G.S. Chapter 40, Article 2, and Chapter 160, Article 37. Therefore, when the pleadings present issuable matter, the cause is not transferred to the Civil Issue Docket, but the clerk first passes on the questions presented after hearing evidence from all parties. If the clerk decides that petitioners cannot proceed with condemnation, then the petitioner may except and appeal. However, if the clerk decides in favor of the petitioner, exceptions may be noted, and the clerk appoints commissioners to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sutton v. DukeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Pue v. . Hood, Comr. of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Thornton v. . BradySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  4. Redevelopment Commission of Greensboro v. HaginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. GastonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Burgess v. BusbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Pyco Supply Co. v. American Centennial InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Rose v. Epley Motor SalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Gilchrist v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  5. Ipock v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API