Perry v. Bassenger
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Stagy, O. J.
The impression is gained from a careful perusal of the record that the judgment below should be affirmed.
In the first place, there is much in the suggestion that the devise to the children of Annie L. Owens was intended to be in fee simple, determinable upon their dying without heirs. O. S., 1137; Willis v. Trust Co., 183 N. C., 267, 111 S. E., 166. It is provided by C. S., 4162, that when real estate is devised to any person, the same shall be held in fee *846simple, unless such devise shall, in plain and express words show, or it shall be plainly intended by the will, or some part…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Springs v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Willis v. Mutual Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Baggett v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Russ v. WoodardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Alexander v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Hassell v. WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- In Re SimmonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- Beam v. . GilkeySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.