Legal Opinion
McCall v. District Court In & For County of Montezuma
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided September 27, 1982No. 82SA266PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DUBOFSKY, Justice.
In this original proceeding, we issued a rule to show cause why the respondent district court’s order denying petitioner Karen McCall’s motion to dismiss a neglect and dependency ease should not be vacated and the case dismissed. We now make the rule absolute.
Timothy McCall’s paternal grandmother, represented by a private attorney, filed a case captioned “People of the State of Colorado in the Interest of Timothy McCall,” seeking a determination that the child Timothy was neglected or dependent under section 19-1-103(20), C.R.S.1973 (1978 Repl. Vol. 8 and 1981 Supp.).1 The…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People in Interest of SSTColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
- Ross v. RossSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931
- S. A. S. v. District Court, in & for the County of JeffersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Everett v. BarrySupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
- Turner v. DISTRICT COURT IN & FOR TENTH JUD. DIST.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- In Re the Termination of Parental Rights of P.A.M.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- McCall v. DISTRICT COURT, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982