Johnson-Lloyd v. Vocational Rehabilitation Office
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
PÍaintiff Detra Johnson-Lloyd filed this pro se action against the Vocational Rehabilitation Office of the Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry (“OVR”) and Fred Motter, a former OVR counselor, for alleged violations of her rights under Title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 1 and the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, when they denied her federal certification as a sewing machine operator.
Now before us is defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. In their motion, defendants ask that we dismiss…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gregory C. Mallett v. Wisconsin Division of Vocational Rehabilitation and Judy R. Norman-NunneryCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Marshall v. SwitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Barrett v. City of AllentownDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Marshall v. SwitzerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- JACKIE S. v. ConnellyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.