Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Switzer
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 17, 1993No. 1740, Docket 93-7186PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CEDARBAUM, District Judge:
Kirk Marshall filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 19831 to challenge a policy of the *927New York State Education Department prohibiting reimbursement for “factory-installed” automotive equipment. Marshall claims that the policy violates Title I of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 720 et seq. This is an appeal from a Judgment of the District Court for the Northern District of New York (Frederick J. Scullin, Jr., Judge) granting appellees’ motion to dismiss the complaint. The district court held that appellant could not bring this action under § 1983 because…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Wilder v. Virginia Hospital Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Doe v. PfrommerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Harris v. JamesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Kapps v. WingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Bartlett v. New York State Board of Law ExaminersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Wood v. TompkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.