Legal Opinion

In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against Caffrey

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1967No. C. D. 5224PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Practically from the outset of his short but stormy legal career, Bradford A. Caffrey was demonstrating how easy it would be to mislead judges, accustomed to regarding the lawyers who practiced before them as honorable individuals. Brief as that career has been, it was marked by a 30-day suspension; 3 by a commitment for contempt; 4 and by at least one other instance of questionable attitude which reached the attention of this court 5 prior to the present disciplinary proceeding.

In consequence of the present proceeding, a trial panel of lawyers and the Board of Governors of the Washington…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. CaffreyWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Caffrey v. Chem-Ionics Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In Re the Disciplinary Proceedings Against CaffreyWashington Supreme Court · 1963

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against StrohWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. RosenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. In Re BucciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  4. In Re BucciSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  5. In Re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against KroghWashington Supreme Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API