Legal Opinion

Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Goodwyn

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 20, 1935No. 3 Div. 134PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The suit is by the surety company praying for the allowance of its claim, with interest, from the fund being administered by the special trustee for the benefit of holders of lawful claims and obligations of nonresident surety corporations admitted and doing business in this state.

The pertinent statutes for construction are those embraced in chapter 45, article 7, of the Code of 1928, of which sections 2640, 2657, and 2658 are a" part. Michie’s Code 1928, § 2640 et seq., p. 442 et seq.

The pertinent provisions on the subject are found in section 2642 of the Code, which…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blake v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. State v. Burchfield Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Davis v. State Ex Rel. County Board of EqualizationAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  4. Vandiver v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  5. Farrell v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cofer v. EnsorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  2. Bouldin v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Allen v. Investors SyndicateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Bouldin v. City of HomewoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API