Legal Opinion
State v. Burchfield Bros.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 7, 1924No. 6 Div. 929PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The appeal is by the state.
The question pertains to the collection of the state’s revenues. The trial was before the court, without a jury. The facts on which the case was tried were agreed upon by counsel.
In Ex parte State, 206 Ala. 575, 90 South. 896, the respective taxable interests in personal property in wbicb the vendor retains a conditional title were declared. Acts 1919, p. 283, § 2.
In State v. Seals Piano Co., 209 Ala. 93, 95 South. 451, it is declared that—
“When the title to some substantial interest in property is vested in one person, and the general title in another, the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sunflower Lumber Co. v. Turner Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
- Bailey, Collector v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- State v. White Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. State ex rel. KetchamIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Mutual Life Insurance v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Lodge 1858, American Federation of Government Employees v. WebbCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- State v. National Cash Credit Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
- Consolidated Coal Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- State v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
- Alabama Textile Products Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.