Legal Opinion
Farrell v. City of Mobile
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided June 21, 1934No. 1 Div. 823PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
This is a bill in equity by the city of Mobile to enjoin respondents, taxicab operators, from using the streets of Mobile as a public or private enterprise for the transportation of passengers in violation of a city ordinance fixing the regulations under which such operations shall be conducted, and without obtaining the consent of the city, as required by section 220, Constitution.
There are two chief contentions made by appellant going to the right of the city to the injunction. The questions are presented by demurrer to the bill. The demurrers were overruled.
The first is…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Frost & Frost Trucking Co. v. Railroad Comm'n of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Packard v. BantonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Sprout v. South BendSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Davis v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Mobile v. FarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Public Ser. Comm. of Wyo. v. GrimshawWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Corte v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Jarrell v. Orlando Transit Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.