Vandiver v. Poe
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City (Heuisler, J.). The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtStockbridge, J.
On the 13th January, 1911, the United Surety Company was placed in the hands of receivers. The bill filed in the case was by some of the stockholders and directors of the company, and among other things alleged that through mismanagement and wastefulness in the conduct of its affairs, the surplus of $250,000 had been altogether wiped out, and its capital stock had been impaired, but nevertheless the said company was solvent, but had been prohibited by an order of the State Insurance Commissioner from writing any further bonds of any nature or description until the impairment of its capital…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- American Casualty Insurance Company's CaseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1896
- Ruggles v. . ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- In Re the Voluntary Dissolution of the Home Provident Safety Fund Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- People Ex Rel. Ruggles v. . ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Hayne v. Metropolitan Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Texas Fidelity & Bonding Co. v. City of AustinTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Vandiver v. Fidelity Savings BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
- Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. GoodwynSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935
- McMurray v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1921
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.