Legal Opinion

Griffin v. Blankenship

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 26, 1958No. 247PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

This appeal turns on whether or not the plaintiff’s evidence, when considered in the light most favorable to him, as it must be when considering a motion for judgment as of nonsuit, is sufficient to carry the case to the jury on the question of actionable negligence. Williamson v. Clay, 243 N.C. 337, 90 S.E. 2d 727, Singletary v. Nixon, 239 N.C. 634, 80 S.E. 2d 676; Hughes v. Thayer, 229 N.C. 773, 51 S.E. 2d 488; Atkins v. Transportation Co., 224 N.C. 688, 32 S.E. 2d 209.

The plaintiff devotes a substantial part of his brief in arguing that the defendant operator of the bulldozer was not an…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Butner v. SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Butner v. . SpeaseSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Atkins v. . Transportation Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Beach v. . PattonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ballou v. Sigma Nu General FraternityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Zilka v. Sanctis Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Weaver v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Williams v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API