Legal Opinion
Russia Cement Co. v. Katzenstein
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
Decided May 28, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions
In Equity. Suit to enjoin the alleged unlawful and fraudulent use of a trade-mark.
1Opinion of the Court
HAZEL, District Judge.
The complainant corporation, citizen of the state of Massachusetts, brings this suit in equity to enjoin and restrain defendants, citizens of New York, and dealers in glue, from using its trade mark and name “Le Page” on bottles or packages containing a liquid glue. The facts of this case are somewhat unusual in their character., The complainant avers that:
“It Is engaged in the manufacture and sale of liquid fish glue, which it has put upon the market under the name of ‘Le Page’s Liquid Glue,’ and has been so engaged continuously since February, 1882; * * * that it has…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McLean v. FlemingSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Tennessee Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Russia Cement Co. v. LePageMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
- Pillsbury-Washburn Flour Mills Co. v. EagleCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1898
- Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Janesville Cotton MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Coca-Cola Co. v. J. G. Butler & SonsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1916
- Revlon, Inc. v. Regal Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961
- Perry v. American Hecolite Denture CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
- Thomas G. Plant Co. v. May Mercantile Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1907