Legal Opinion

Thomas G. Plant Co. v. May Mercantile Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Decided February 4, 1907No. 5,196PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

FINKELNBURG, District Judge.

Owing to the number of cases submitted at this term and other intervening and pressing duties, I *230find it impracticable to attempt to write opinions in full without unduly delaying litigation. I will, however, dictate an informal memorandum, indicating some of the reasons which have led me to the conclusion finally arrived at in this case.

No question is raised in this case as to complainant’s legal right to the trade-mark “Queen Quality” at the time of the acts here complained of. That right had been previously established in the case of the Plant Company v. May…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thomas G. Plant Co. v. May Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  2. Hutchinson v. BlumbergU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1892
  3. Russia Cement Co. v. KatzensteinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Coca-Cola Co. v. J. G. Butler & SonsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1916
  3. Revlon, Inc. v. Regal Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1961
  4. Thomas G. Plant Co. v. HamburgerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API