Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Morgan Stanley & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LYNCH, District Judge.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) moves for enforcement of two subpoenas issued to Morgan Stanley & Co., Inc., and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co. (collectively, “Morgan Stanley”), in connection with separate charges of race and/or sex discrimination filed by four African-American women employees under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and/or the Equal Pay Act.
Morgan Stanley argues that the subpoenas should not be enforced, or should be enforced only subject to protective orders, on three separate grounds. It argues (1) that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Stauffer Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Associated Dry Goods Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Duling v. Gristede's Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bay Ridge Toyota, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- City of New York v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2004
- People v. ThainNew York Supreme Court · 2009
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Aon Consulting, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2001