Roy Burt Enterprises, Inc. v. Marsh
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
*263MARTIN, Justice.
We hold that plaintiff was not entitled to summary judgment because there exist genuine issues of material fact.
In November 1987, plaintiff, Roy Burt Enterprises, Inc., sued defendants Waymon and Shirley Marsh for unpaid accounts for goods and services in the amount of $48,396.48. In response to the summons, Waymon Marsh wrote a letter to Mr. Roy Burt, president of Roy Burt Enterprises, stating that the fertilizer sold to him by plaintiff was contaminated and had damaged his crops, land and health and that he should not have to pay for it. This letter was dated 7 January 1988…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Morrison v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Performance Motors, Incorporated v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Alimenta (u.s.a.), Inc. v. Anheuser-Busch Companies,inc., Alimenta (u.s.a.), Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
- Investors Title Insurance v. HerzigSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Warren v. Guttanit, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alberti v. Manufactured Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Riley v. Ken Wilson Ford, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Siemens Medical Systems, Inc. v. Nuclear Cardiology Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1996
- Rogers v. T.J.X. Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- Barbee v. Harford Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.