Legal Opinion

Barbee v. Harford Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 3, 1991No. 587PA90PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MITCHELL, Justice.

The issue before this Court is whether recovery of the damages sought by the plaintiff is precluded by the exclusionary provisions of the comprehensive garagekeepers liability insurance policy issued by the defendant insurance company. We conclude that the exclusionary language of the policy prevents recovery of the damages sought by the plaintiff.

This case came before the trial court upon stipulated facts. The plaintiff operates a “Precision Tune” automobile repair shop in Charlotte. The defendant insurance company issued the plaintiff a garagekeepers insurance policy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fidelity Bankers Life Insurance v. DortchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. VolentineCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. GloverMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Parker v. STATE CAPITAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Western World Insurance v. CarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wm. C. Vick Construction Co. v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1999
  2. North Carolina Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Century Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1994
  3. Daniel v. City of MorgantonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  4. Alliance Mutual Insurance v. DoveCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  5. Geico Insurance Co. v. LarsonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API