Legal Opinion
Coldwell Banker & Co. v. Eyde
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided May 28, 1986No. 85 C 8036PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DECKER, District Judge.
The defendants, Louis and George Eyde, executed a promissory note to pay a brokerage fee allegedly owed the plaintiff, Coldwell, Banker & Co. (Coldwell), in connection with the sale and leaseback of certain Michigan properties. Plaintiff brings this action to enforce the note. The defendants move to quash the summons and dismiss the complaint.
I. Motion to Quash 1
Plaintiff attempted to serve the defendants by first-class mail as provided by Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(c)(2)(C)(ii). Under this rule:
A summons and complaint may be served upon a defendant ...…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Armco, Inc. v. Penrod-Stauffer Building Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Philip Joseph Twohy, Jr. v. The First National Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Agnes L. Morse v. Elmira Country ClubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- M. Thora Worrell v. B.F. Goodrich CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Kness v. GrimmDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
- Leger v. DessureaultDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1990
- Dean v. KIS Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1988