Legal Opinion
Dean v. KIS Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 8, 1988No. 87 C 5833PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ALESIA, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have filed a motion for entry of default judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b) and 55(b)(2) against defendants KIS, S.A., Serge Crasnianski, Peter Burgess, and Phillip Frank (“the defendants”). In response, defendants have filed a motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 11. For the reasons set forth below, both motions are denied.
I. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment
On June 30, 1987, plaintiffs filed a complaint against seven defendants. This motion is directed against only five of the defendants.1 The threshold…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Armco, Inc. v. Penrod-Stauffer Building Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Agnes L. Morse v. Elmira Country ClubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Robert Norlock v. City of GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Stranahan Gear Company, Inc. v. Nl Industries, Inc. v. Blue Streak Industries, Inc. Appeal of Nl Industries, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Magnus Electronics, Inc. v. La Republica ArgentinaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Turek v. A.S.P. of Moorhead, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000