Legal Opinion
Armco, Inc. v. Penrod-Stauffer Building Systems, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided May 10, 1984No. 83-1874PublishedCited by 299 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNSWORTH, Senior Circuit Judge:
A default judgment went against the defendant, Penrod-Stauffer Building Systems, Inc., after which the defendant filed a motion for relief under F.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4). From the denial of that motion, the defendant brought this appeal.
We conclude that the judgment was void for lack of personal jurisdiction of the defendant, and reverse.
I
On February 28,1983, Armco, Inc. filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland seeking to recover approximately $80,000 from Pen-rod-Stauffer on a claim for material sold. The next day, Armco…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Helen Varnes v. Local 91, Glass Bottle Blowers Association of the United States and CanadaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Theresa Hicklin v. Robert EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955
- Ruddies v. Auburn Spark Plug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- United States v. Mollenhauer Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
- United States v. MilanaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957
3Cited by299 opinions
- Friedman v. Estate of PresserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Dow v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
- Combs v. Nick Garin TruckingCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Umbenhauer v. WoogCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Media Duplication Services, Ltd. v. Hdg Software, Inc., Joseph WineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
294 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.