Legal Opinion

Macy v. City of Fontana

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 23, 2016No. D068508MPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed 3/23/16 Unmodified opinion attached CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA VIRGINIA MACY et al., D068508 Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. (Super. Ct. No. CIVDS1107686) THE CITY OF FONTANA, ORDER MODIFYING OPINION Defendant and Respondent; [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT] TEN-NINETY, LTD., Real Party in Interest and Respondent. THE COURT It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on February 23, 2016 be modified as follows: On page 14, the first paragraph of section III, beginning with "Finally, we must reject plaintiffs' contention,"…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Slater v. BlackwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Friedland v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. County of Solano v. Vallejo Redevelopment AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. County of Los Angeles v. Continental Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Starr v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API