Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Ventra Sandusky, L.L.C.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided August 6, 2018No. Case No. 3:16CV2817PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James G. Carr, Sr. U.S. District Judge *955In this Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) interference suit, Plaintiff Jerremy Dyer seeks damages against Defendant Ventra Sandusky, L.L.C., for terminating him under Defendant's no-fault attendance policy. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 2615(a)(1), 2617(a). Pending is Defendant's motion for summary judgement. (Doc. 13).

For the following reasons, I grant the motion.

Background

I draw all reasonable inferences of fact in favor of Plaintiff, as the non-moving party. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Tech. Servs., Inc. , 504 U.S. 451, 456, 112 S.Ct. 2072, 119 L.Ed.2d 265…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jerremy Dyer v. Ventra SanduskyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Schobert v. CSX Transportation IncDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API