Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. Polaroid Corp. v. Denihan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1986No. 86AP-730PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.

Relator, Polaroid Corporation, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas and raises three assignments of error as follows:

“1. The trial court erred as a matter of law in holding that the state appellees did not have a clear legal duty to award the Ohio Driver License Program contract to Polaroid as low bidder and that Polaroid did not have a clear legal right to the award, in that the state appellees expressly intended to include Polaroid’s plastic-coated film within their base material specification and determined, prior to the bid opening, that the Polaroid film…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Dayton, ex rel. Scandrick v. City of Dayton Mayor McGeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Friedman v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State ex rel. Chevalier v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Griffith v. J.C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leaseway Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Kokosing Construction Co. v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Upjohn Co. v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API