Legal Opinion
State, Ex Rel. Polaroid Corp. v. Denihan
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 9, 1986No. 86AP-730PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWhiteside, J.
Relator, Polaroid Corporation, appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas and raises three assignments of error as follows:
“1. The trial court erred as a matter of law in holding that the state appellees did not have a clear legal duty to award the Ohio Driver License Program contract to Polaroid as low bidder and that Polaroid did not have a clear legal right to the award, in that the state appellees expressly intended to include Polaroid’s plastic-coated film within their base material specification and determined, prior to the bid opening, that the Polaroid film…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City of Dayton, ex rel. Scandrick v. City of Dayton Mayor McGeeOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Friedman v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- State ex rel. Chevalier v. BrownOhio Supreme Court · 1985
- Griffith v. J.C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Leaseway Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Kokosing Construction Co. v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Upjohn Co. v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1991