Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of MacMullen

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

The petition of Labbe for letters of administration of the MacMullen Estate showed on its face that it was presented five days after his death and that he left a daughter living in Multnomah County surviving him. It was error to grant the petition of Labbe for his appointment as administrator. His appointment was not void, but voidable: Ramp v. McDaniel, 12 Or. 108, 115 (6 Pac. 456); In re Owen’s Estate, 32 Utah, 469 (91 Pac. 283, 285).

Attorneys’ fees for service rendered in connection with a partial administration of an estate by an administrator acting under an erroneous or a voidable…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Re Faling EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Upham v. BramwellOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Ford v. GilbertOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Knight v. HamakarOregon Supreme Court · 1901

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Baxter's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State Land Board v. SovenkoOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  3. In Re Lachmund's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  4. In Re Workman's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Kalloo v. Estate of SmallSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API