Hurd v. Seim
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
In Equity. Suit by James D. Hurd, the Consolidated Rubber Tire Company, and the Rubber Tire Wheel Company against William Seim and Gustave Reissig. On application by complainants for preliminary injunction, and also on petition of the Diamond Rubber Company of New York for leave to intervene as party defendant.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
This is a,suit in equity brought by the complainants to restrain the defendants Seim and Reissig from infringing what is known as the Grant patent, dated February 18, 1896, No. 554,-675, and issued to Arthur W. Grant for “rubber-tired wheel.” The validity of this patent has been adjudicated in certain circuits, and its invalidity has been adjudicated in other circuits. It was held valid in the Second circuit by the Circuit Court and also by the Circuit Court of Appeals in Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. & Rubber Tire Wheel Co. v. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York, 162 Fed. 892.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Litchfield v. Goodnow's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Rubber Tire Wheel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Eldred v. KesslerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Green v. WahlSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Hurd v. James Goold Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1912
- Hurd v. Woodward Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1911